When S planned to sublet a property they were leasing from T, which statement is true?

The correct answer is that S could increase the rent and make a profit. When a lessee (in this case, S) decides to sublet a property, they have the potential to establish their own rental terms with the sublessee, which can include charging a higher rent than what S is paying to T. This practice can create a profit opportunity for S, as long as it does not violate any terms of the original lease agreement between S and T, or any applicable laws.

In a subletting scenario, while S takes on the role of landlord to the sublessee, the original lease agreement often permits this arrangement, provided S has obtained permission from T. It's important to keep in mind that S must remain aware of their obligations to T, including continuing to pay rent as specified in the initial lease and ensuring that the property is well-maintained.

Other options imply circumstances that do not accurately reflect the nature of subleasing. For example, while T has certain responsibilities, it does not mean T is the only one liable for damages. Additionally, the notion that T pays rent directly to the owner does not relate to the subletting scenario appropriately. Lastly, even with a sublet, S typically retains some degree of liability towards